On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 16:40 -0500, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> On 02/26, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > I assume you're talking about reporting abuse? If you actually would go
> > to dnswl.org, you'll see a Report Abuse link right hand, which tells you
> > what's needed.
>
> No. Matthias (DNSWL) asked me to "try to get us included in that process".
"No" what? Not reporting abuse? You're pretty confusing. Mind taking a
whopping minute or three to explain in full what you really have in
mind?
> If I create the necessary plugin, etc., what will it take to get it
> included in SA?
Wow, I seriously fail to read any possible meaning of that sentence into
your original subject -- err, rather, original full post.
"Included in SA" in the sense of getting the functionality into upstream
code? Then this would seem to be a general sketch: Write the plugin,
while keeping DNSWL tightly in the loop to sync the process. Submit the
plugin as an attachment to a feature request bug report. Gather some
opinions there. If the code and idea is deemed good, eventually sign a
CLA (assuming it's a non-trivial change), so the code can be accepted
for upstream inclusion.
If that's not it again -- please go back to my first paragraph.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
