----- "Per Jessen" <p...@computer.org> wrote: > Jonas Eckerman wrote: > > > (And of course, if this catches on, you'll have to provide RFC > style > > documentation.) > > > > See Justins posting from two days back: > > http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/ > http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark-04.txt > > That proposal does not appear to have caught a lot of interest in > 2004/2005, but perhaps it might now. > > > /Per Jessen, Zürich
Personally I think it is a great idea and anything to help combat the spam is always a worthwhile effort. Is it possible to resurrect that proposal and worth with the original authors and perhaps combine the efforts ? Anybody who takes time to come up with ideas like this deserves the support of the community. I am all for helping, where I can, to take this forward. -- Thanks, Phil