jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > "MM" == Michael Mansour <m...@npgx.com.au> writes: > > MM> Why couldn't the mailing list filters simply whitelist your email address > or > MM> whitelist people automatically subscribed to the mailing list? > Yes, but that's beside the point. That is not solving the bad thing > you guys are doing. > > MM> The world isn't perfect and the only way to get things changed is to > complaint > MM> and/or do something about it yourself. But to blanket criticise rules that > MM> many sites are using worldwide doesn't really make sense to me. > > You guys are doing something wrong. Maybe you think that every country > is like the USA or something. You blew it. Your rules are wrong. >
As has been pointed out before, the rule you are complaining about is not part of a standard SA install. Your emails score a grand total of 0 points here (not counting the whitelists that hit because of the list server). Also, the rule that hits on hinet, only scores 1.6 points. That means that on a normal system (where they have not lowered the required score to a ridiculous level), you would need to score another 3.4 points from other rules in order to be marked as spam. Where are the rest of the points coming from? -- Bowie -- Bowie
