On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, jdow wrote:
It is a good thing this issue was raised. It led to appropriate mass
check runs. I expect that will lead to saner scoring within the SA
framework. If not and it bites me, THEN I'll raise the issue again.
Does that seem fair?
50_scores.cf:score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI 0 -8.0 0 -8.0
50_scores.cf:score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI 0 -4.3 0 -4.3
50_scores.cf:score HABEAS_CHECKED 0 -0.2 0 -0.2
Still no changes through the sa-update channel.
There won't be until after 3.3.0 ships. Then changes to 3.2.x (including a
possible 3.2.6 release) will be considered.
As far as I know rule promotion and rescoring are not automatic for 3.2.x,
it's still a manual process. All of the focus right now is on getting
3.3.0 out.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with /etc/sendmail.cf, "it never
does quite what I want. I wish Christopher Robin was here."
-- Peter da Silva in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7 days until Christmas
