Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > If we had more mass-check data from a wider number of mail recipients > maybe it would change things, statistically, maybe it wouldn't. New > mass-check contributors are always welcome. They take very little > effort to manage once you've set it up (I ignore mine for years at a > time).
Is there a good howto for setting this up? /Per Jessen, Zürich