On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:21:00 -0700 LuKreme <krem...@kreme.com> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 1:32, Christian Brel > <brel.spamassassin091...@copperproductions.co.uk > > wrote: > > > the issue of having that score > > reduced in favour of a known commercial bulk mailer is undesirable. > > The trouble is you seem to consider ALL commercial senders to be > spammers. That's just not true. > No, I don't. But I do consider many commercial emailers to abuse personal data for their own gain. To me it is spam if it does not directly relate to a transaction that I have instigated. If it's special offers, news or other marketing rubbish aimed at selling me something or telling me about new services - it's spam. We've moved on since the Tandy/Radio Shack days of data collected at the point of sale forever being used to abuse you forever more. -- This e-mail and any attachments may form pure opinion and may not have any factual foundation. Please check any details provided to satisfy yourself as to suitability or accuracy of any information provided. Data Protection: Unless otherwise requested we may pass the information you have provided to other partner organisations.
