J.D. Falk wrote:
There's only one Safe list (which SA still calls Habeas.) In other words: no
difference between the SOI and COI lists. Or at least, that's how it's
supposed to be -- so Kris's results were somewhat surprising.
*shrug* I haven't seen enough evidence in the mail flow here to bother
messing with the stock scores in the installations here, but there *are*
three different rules in the stock SA set (up to date via sa-update):
# Habeas Accredited Senders
# Last octet of the returned A record indicates the Habeas-assigned
# "Permission Level" of the Sender.
# 10 to 39 Personal, transactional, and Confirmed
Opt In
# 40 to 59 Secure referrals and Single Opt In
# 60 to 99 Checked but not accredited by Habeas.
#
# sa-accredit.habeas.com is for SpamAssassin use.
#
header HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI eval:check_rbl('habeas-firsttrusted',
'sa-accredit.habeas.com.', '127\.\d+\.\d+\.[123]\d')
describe HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI Habeas Accredited Confirmed Opt-In or Better
tflags HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI net nice
header HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI
eval:check_rbl_sub('habeas-firsttrusted', '127\.\d+\.\d+\.[45]\d')
describe HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI Habeas Accredited Opt-In or Better
tflags HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI net nice
header HABEAS_CHECKED
eval:check_rbl_sub('habeas-firsttrusted', '127\.\d+\.\d+\.[6789]\d')
describe HABEAS_CHECKED Habeas Checked
tflags HABEAS_CHECKED net nice
score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI 0 -8.0 0 -8.0
score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI 0 -4.3 0 -4.3
score HABEAS_CHECKED 0 -0.2 0 -0.2
-kgd
