On 11/23/2009 4:37 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:14 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
You should complain to ReturnPath. Iirc, HABEAS used to sue
spammers misusing their technology. Don't know if ReturnPath
continues prac ticing this.
Actually, you're confusing Habeas's first technology (which involved
suing misuse of their copywritten header, and was abandoned years
ago) with their "safe list" whitelist product, which Return Path now
operates. Rather than suing them, we'll simply kick 'em off the list
if they don't meet our standards.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI has
some basic info, including an address to complain at if you're
receiving spam from a safelisted IP.
I'm more curious as to why those two rules get such high scores in a
default SA setup. Why are they so heavy?
HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI 0 -8.0 0 -8.0
HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI 0 -4.3 0 -4.3
(I've turned them down drastically in our configuration to about 1/3 to
1/4 of their original values.)
