On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 23:20 +0100, Per Jessen wrote: > >> I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware of how it > >> works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful lot of ham, and I > >> wondered if I was doing something wrong. > > > > Yes, UCEPROTECT seems to be just a big scam. > > A scam?? You'll have to explain that one in a bit more detail. They > provide the data free of charge.
Scam - something set up only to make money in not-very-fair way. > > Just one opinion - > > http://www.aaroncake.net/misc/showthought.asp?thought=57 There are > > many more like this one on the web. Too bad there are some commercial > > appliances that use this RBL by default. Otherwise noone in their sane > > minds would use this (at least not any levels higher than 1). > As usual, it's not UCEPROTECT you should be swearing at, it's the people > who use it. Yes, Them too. But the whole schema of UCEPROTECT operation stinks. They add people to their blacklists with no clear rules standing behind it. And they demand money for delisting you. It's a simple extortion. It's as if I wrote on my webpage 'Per Jessen is a stupid asshole' and wanted money from you for removal of that text. The problem is that they are quite popular because they seem so 'professional' so many people get 'hit' by them. -- d'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'Yb `b k...@epsilon.eu.org d' d' http://epsilon.eu.org/ Yb `b,-,.,-,.,-,.,-,.,-,.,-,.d'
