> > I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware > of how it works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful > lot of ham, and I wondered if I was doing something wrong. > > I've set the score to 0.01 for now, while I watch and see how > it works here. What's a more reasonable score? I don't think > I would ever use > UCEPROTECT2 or UCEPROTECT3, as we have a lot of > verizon/comcast users where the whole block or ASN could be > blacklisted. > > Can you give me some history of this blocklist? > > Thanks, > Alex >
Alex, we use all 3 and adjust score accordingly... have had good general results since we started using them... we are not or have not been doing anything scientific with that info, so it is just another potential spammy sign... - rh
