> > Since I didn't clearly write the part you are reacting on, it would be nice > > from you to remove my name from the begin, as you removed the rest of > > e-mail.
On 13.11.09 10:24, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > Matus has emailed me *off list* and asked me to point out that there is an > error in my post. > That is, his name appears at the top of it, but it is not his quote. Whilst > it is clear > to most people by the indentation that I was responding to Chris Hoogendyk, I > must for my error > and the clear confusion that it must have caused some people. Hello, please configure your mailer to wrap lines below 80 characters per line. 72 to 75 is usually OK. Thank you. > to my error in the interests of the childnishness and game playing that goes > on in this list. > Therefore, the correct follow it that I should have posted is below. > > I'm sure your email to me, Matus, is genuine and in no way some kind of gam > eplaying > or point scoring exercise - but could I ask you KINDLY please *don't* email > me off list. > If you have a point to make about something I have written on a list, it > would be better to > make it *on* that list. Thank you. Am I the only one who thints that issues clearly off-topic should be sent off-list? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
