On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 06:24, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk <rich...@buzzhost.co.uk> wrote:
> Remember, if the > sender was really clean, their would be zero need for CC. Absolute unadulterated BS. This is equivalent to saying "all of those lay-people who just get gmail or yahoo or hotmail accounts -- if they weren't spammers, they'd just run their own mail servers instead". All of those people who don't maintain their own cars? they must all be car thieves. Same BS logic. CC has legitimate customers, whether you want to admit it or not. Therefore, even if a sender is "really clean", there can still be a need for CC.
