On tir 13 okt 2009 16:22:55 CEST, "McDonald, Dan" wrote
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 15:42 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On søn 11 okt 2009 02:31:58 CEST, John Rudd wrote
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 16:44, Warren Togami <wtog...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Given that zen.spamhaus.org is a combination of XBL and PBL, this
>>> data seems to confirm the good reputation of Spamhaus.
>> Er.. Zen is a combination of SBL, XBL, and PBL. Not just the
XBL and PBL.
On 11.10.09 03:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> and also CSS
CSS is included in SBL :)
Not as far as SpamAssassin is concerned. RCVD_IN_SBL only checks for
127.0.0.2 in zen, while CSS returns 127.0.0.3, so a new rule has to be
added to include the CSS data. My rule is:
header RCVD_IN_CSS eval:check_rbl('zen-lastexternal',
'zen.spamhaus.org.', '127.0.0.3')
describe RCVD_IN_CSS Received via a relay in Spamhaus CSS
tflags RCVD_IN_CSS net
score RCVD_IN_CSS 0 0.509 0 0.905 # n=0 n=2
this rule will make another dns lookup :/
use check_rbl_sub to avoid it, i posted a rule here that does it, and
one of the ninjas make the same error :/
http://www.nabble.com/New-spamhaus-list-not-included-td25736766.html
if check_rbl is cached dns sorry for my own mistake :)
--
xpoint
