On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 15:42 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On søn 11 okt 2009 02:31:58 CEST, John Rudd wrote > >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 16:44, Warren Togami <wtog...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> Given that zen.spamhaus.org is a combination of XBL and PBL, this > >>> data seems to confirm the good reputation of Spamhaus. > >> Er.. Zen is a combination of SBL, XBL, and PBL. Not just the XBL and PBL. > > On 11.10.09 03:10, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > and also CSS > > CSS is included in SBL :)
Not as far as SpamAssassin is concerned. RCVD_IN_SBL only checks for
127.0.0.2 in zen, while CSS returns 127.0.0.3, so a new rule has to be
added to include the CSS data. My rule is:
header RCVD_IN_CSS eval:check_rbl('zen-lastexternal',
'zen.spamhaus.org.', '127.0.0.3')
describe RCVD_IN_CSS Received via a relay in Spamhaus CSS
tflags RCVD_IN_CSS net
score RCVD_IN_CSS 0 0.509 0 0.905 # n=0 n=2
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX
www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
