On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
On 10/04/2009 04:07 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
> The "Oddity" I was pointing out at the beginning of the thread is not
> prevalence of .cn URI's, but rather most of them appear to be exactly
> 8 characters long.
Are there any other .cn domain formats (like {8}.com.cn) that would be
of interest? I was trolling through a spam quarantine I'd forgoten about
and found a message containing this:
{domain}.cn
{domain}.com.cn
{domain}.net.cn
I wouldn't bother. I only wanted to check the relative % of CN_EIGHT to
CN_URL because I found it strange that the majority of CN_URL had exactly 8
characters.
In the end this rule is unsafe to use in production so it doesn't matter much
to check for even less prevalent matches that we can't use either.
OK
BTW, I have commit access now. Mind if I move these rules from your sandbox
into my own sandbox?
Go ahead.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm seriously considering getting one of those bright-orange prison
overalls and stencilling PASSENGER on the back. Along with the paper
slippers, I ought to be able to walk right through security.
-- Brian Kantor in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximately 9164580 firearms legally purchased in the U.S. this year
