On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
On 10/01/2009 02:36 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
> The "Oddity" I was pointing out at the beginning of the thread is not
> prevalence of .cn URI's, but rather most of them appear to be exactly
> 8 characters long. Could someone please commit my T_CN_8_URL rule to
> the sandbox so we can see if that trend holds beyond my own corpa?
I've put a .CN 8 URI rule into my sandbox file but it may be a few days
before it gets committed, my stuff is in flux right now...
# 8-letter .cn domain, per Warren Togami
uri CN_EIGHT m;^https?://(?:[^./]+\.)*[^./]{8}\.cn/;
describe CN_EIGHT .CN uri with eight-letter domain name
score CN_EIGHT 0.10
Possible bug here... Do all URI's necessarily have a trailing slash?
First results are in:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091003-r821273-n/T_CN_EIGHT/detail
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are hell-bent and determined to allocate the talent, the
resources, the money, the innovation to absolutely become a
powerhouse in the ad business. -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer
...because allocating talent to securing Windows isn't profitable?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximately 9125940 firearms legally purchased in the U.S. this year