On 17.09.09 23:07, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > Microsoft Office Outlook 11. Wow, I didn't know it sucks *that* badly. > No proper threading headers (In-Reply-To and References),
I think that newest outlook does that, luckily. However it still can't thread on those and uses its stupid Thread-Index and Thread-Topic headers. > produces fugly > Kammquoting, there is software called outlook-quotefix. Even better version is there for outlook express. > and even injects an empty line after each and every line of > text. I really wonder if it does this always or only when set to "Use microsoft word for composing messages". Gotta check when I get around this damn fscking "install updates at shutdown" thingy (when I'll be able to install updates without having to turn computer off from windows). > And *then* converts that monstrosity into HTML, preserving the > utterly broken format. now THIS is well-known for years I'd say :) When was M$ software able to produce correct and simple HTML? (No, in notepad it's not the software but the user...) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "To Boot or not to Boot, that's the question." [WD1270 Caviar]
