So - what ever happened to this project? Was it finished?
decoder wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
I don't see any need for the model to be dynamic. Periodic
recalculation of it should be just fine. I bet even daily
reprocessing will prove to be over zealous. Weekly, perhaps even
monthly.
This is what I think as well :)
I'm thinking that FPs and FNs are bayes problem anyway. This tool
need to concentrate on seeing just what rules hit and building off
that. I'd go so far to say that as far as SVM is concerned, there is
no such thing as a false postive or negative.
What do you mean by that? Of course FPs and FNs might also be a
problem for the SVM, every wrong classified point is certainly a
problem for a machine learning algorithm. However, I think that the
SVM is quite robust to a certain amount of FPs/FNs if the majority of
the training points is correct.
So, if you feel like trying out the plugin, let me know how well it
works =) I'm especially interested in those cases where it increases
the spam detection rate (reducing false negatives). Might be easy to
extract this information from logs.
Thanks and regards,
Chris
