>> On 12-Sep-2009, at 10:27, Clunk Werclick wrote: > > <tangent>Interestingly, It is fair to say that Jari's > follow up *did* show Bayes giving it 5 points. This was > then destroyed by AWL dropping > 4.1 off of it: > > 5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% > -4.1 AWL: From: address is in the auto machine.</tangent> >
No. AWL disabled the BOTNET ;) Many rules to disable, the total was 17 what counts.
