> On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 22:54 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > remember this is public maillist, dont shuth the help you get
> > 
> > why not set the reply-to to supp...@microsoft.com ? no i dont like the  
> > idear but you are on public maillist and want the answer to come there  
> > not in private forgede mailbox, sorry i have a bad day

Benny, better get a mailer that supports List-Reply ...

On 14.09.09 08:37, Clunk Werclick wrote:
> Subject: Re: Non scoring 'Bank Deposit' spam
> From: Clunk Werclick <mailbacku...@googlemail.com>
> Reply-To: mailbacku...@googlemail.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> In-Reply-To: <20090913225422.98502zg1g6e9c...@www.jersore.net>
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:37:22 +0100
> 
> What are you prattling on about?

He doesn't like our Reply-To: header set to your address. Of course it's
useless (when set to same address than yout From: address).

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory. 

Reply via email to