On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:28:49 -0500 "Dennis B. Hopp" <dh...@coreps.com> wrote:
> I'm using maia-mailguard with spamassassin 3.2.5. For the most part > it seems to be working ok but I feel like too many messages are > hitting BAYES_00 (roughly 3.7% of all messages) 3.7% of all messages sounds far too *low*, most of your ham should be hitting BAYES_00. > and BAYES_99 is only > hitting about 1.7%. I have bayes autolearn on with ham being > learned at -1.0 and spam learned at 8.0 Bear in mind that autolearning uses it's own version of the score that excludes whitelisting and Bayes, which means that very little ham will reach the -1 threshold unless you've added your own site-specific rules for identifying it.
