>Which of course means we've long since passed the point where any of >these are going to do the spammers any good. That's the frustrating >part.
I thought that the point was that since it cost a spammer the same to send out a million emails as to send out one, he was happy if only one of the recipients responded. I live in the UK. The chances of anyone here buying prescription drugs from a web site are non-existent: they are paid for either by the health service or (for those who have medical insurance) by insurers. And the, er, "get it up" medicines are now available over the counter. Yet all co.uk addresses get mountains of this type of spam which presumably sell nothing. I find it quicker to delete them manually rather than spending time altering a regex and restarting SA. Roger -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-NEW-SPAM-FLOOD--www.shopXX.net-tp24139422p24486959.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
