On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 05:16 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Justin Mason<j...@jmason.org> wrote:
> > I've heard that they are diligent about terminating abusive clients.
> > Are you reporting these spams to them?
> >
> > --j.
> >
>
> >From what I've seen, most of the traffic from them probably doesn't
> qualify as spam by the common definition. It is, however, stuff that
> nobody here wants. I'm surprised SA is giving them a pass, but there
> have been other strange things that got a free ride through SA in the
> past, like Habeas certified junk.
>
>
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 09:55, Mike
> > Cardwell<spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com> wrote:
> >> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm probably missing something here - but Constant Contact (who we block
> >>> by IP) have been a nagging source of spam for us. I'm just wondering why
> >>> 25_uribl.cf has this line in it:
> >>>
> >>> ## DOMAINS TO SKIP (KNOWN GOOD)
> >>>
> >>> # Don't bother looking for example domains as per RFC 2606.
> >>> uridnsbl_skip_domain example.com example.net example.org
> >>>
> >>> ......
> >>> uridnsbl_skip_domain constantcontact.com corporate-ir.net cox.net cs.com
> >>>
> >>> Is this a uri that is really suitable for white listing ?
> >>
> >> A set of perl modules has been uploaded to cpan today for talking to the
> >> ConstantContact API:
> >>
> >> http://search.cpan.org/~arich/Email-ConstantContact-0.02/lib/Email/ConstantContact.pm
> >>
> >> I just thought it was a weird coincidence, seeing as I'd never heared of
> >> them before today.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mike Cardwell - IT Consultant and LAMP developer
> >> Cardwell IT Ltd. (UK Reg'd Company #06920226) http://cardwellit.com/
> >>
> >>
> >
