Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 02.07.09 08:36, Kasper Sacharias Eenberg wrote:
Is this site spamming?
I really can't figure it out! (They have full names/addresses) and hit
the 'RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED -4.30' rule.
But the mails look obviously like spam to me.
they seem not to mail random addresses but googling revealed complaints of
non-working unsubscribing...
anyone running their own SA install, or have the ability to adjust
scores should do this:
score RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED 10
tflags RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED net
which is why you should always understand that ANY company thats to PAYS
ANYONE or ANY COMPANY to get negative scores in order to slip past
anti-spam engines is suspect.
I actually take all those 'certified' rules (that certify spammers in
fact) and make them positive scores.
have not had one compliant yet, but, then again, all your users might be
waiting for their 'free lotto' numbers in order to prepare for their
business day meetings.
google for 'freelotto.com+spam' and see what appear to be 75,000 'hits'
for that combination.
What I don't understand is why SpamAssassin default rules still give a
credit on it and other rules where there is a questionable business
model behind this practice.
mass mailed (bulk) spam or not, is not business critical email and users
can always whitelist any marketing list they want stuff from.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
_________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
_________________________________________________________________________
