On Sun, June 28, 2009 01:57, Jason Haar wrote: > All this talk about trying to catch urls that contain spaces/etc got me > thinking: why isn't this a standard SA feature? i.e if SA sees > "www(whitespace|comma|period)-combo(therest)", then rewrite it as the > url and process.
spammers need to rewrite webbrowsers also :=) will you click on a url that is not click bare ? > That way you get the whole force of SURBLs/etc onto it? I'm assuming all > these "shop" urls this thread has been agonizing about are already in > RBLs of course... one could extend rule set to use ReplaceTags ? -- xpoint
