> > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK 0 # n=1 n=2 n=3 > > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0 1.615 0 0.877 # n=0 n=2 > > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP 0 0.001 0 0.001 # n=0 n=2 > > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0 0.001 0 0.353 # n=0 n=2 > > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP 0 # n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3 > > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS 0 0.182 0 0.801 # n=0 n=2 > > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB 0 1.117 0 0.619 # n=0 n=2 > > 50_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_ZOMBIE 0 # n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3
On 23.06.09 14:50, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > Notice that the SORBS "spam sources" list (the one that charged a delisting > fee) is not used. I know. It's neither in dnsbl.sorbs.net agregate zone for some time. It was apparently removed indirectly because of the $50 delisting fee. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.
