On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 13:52 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, RW wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:03:43 -0500 > > Andy Dorman <ador...@ironicdesign.com> wrote: > >> ##{ FS_TEEN_BAD > >> header FS_TEEN_BAD Subject =~ > >> /\b(?:teens?|girls?|boys?... > >> describe FS_TEEN_BAD Subject says something bad about teens, > >> girls, boys ##} FS_TEEN_BAD > > You aren't checking the boundary after the first word. Since it's a > > subject test I think the .{1,15} could probably be a .+ > > You might also throw in jailbait and lolita. Also it's very common for > > porn spam to use z in plurals e.g. girlz, boyz.
doesn't the first ?: negate that whole part of the test? Seems like it should start out as /\b(teen|girl|boy|jailbait|lolita)[sz]?.{0,15}\b > > Two 'p's in 'whipping'. One 'x' in 'sexy'.... :) I've seen sexxxy as well, maybe: sex(?:x{0,3}y|ual) > > - Charles -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part