John Rudd wrote: > I believe Theo's point is that: Just because it's porn doesn't mean > it's unsolicited. The deciding factor is not "it's porn? therefore SA > should detect it" > Well as my second sentence said - there is ALREADY a rule in 72_active.cf that detects this. That's all Andy was talking about. There's an existing rule and he proposed an update that would make it more effective to do *what it is already designed to do*
-- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
