On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 04:11 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > What about some grep love, and splitting that up in at least less and > greater than a total of score 15? See my post about 6 hours ago, and > considerably more hits in the low-ish scoring spam. > > > > Spam: 192 > > (thats a total count since 3 May) > > > > Totals since last Thursday 14 May > > > Rule Name Score Ham Spam %of Ham %of Spam > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > EMAILBL_TEST_LEM 0.50 0 11 0.00% 5.73% > > Sorry, no. :) The dates and numbers don't match, unless you didn't get > any spam early this month. > > 192 * 0.0573 == 11.002 > > Is this what you're looking for: Starting point as of 13 May with plug-in - Spam: 97 14 May Spam: 8 Total 105 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EMAILBL_TEST_LEM 0.50 0 1 0.00% 0.95% 15 May Spam: 8 Total 113 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EMAILBL_TEST_LEM 0.50 0 3 0.00% 2.65%
16 May Spam: 7 Total 120 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EMAILBL_TEST_LEM 0.50 0 3 0.00% 2.50% 17 May Spam: 3 Total 123 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EMAILBL_TEST_LEM 0.50 0 3 0.00% 2.44% 18 May Spam: 12 Total 135 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EMAILBL_TEST_LEM 0.50 0 5 0.00% 3.70% 19 May Spam: 28 Total 163 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EMAILBL_TEST_LEM 0.50 0 10 0.00% 6.13% 20 May Spam: 19 Total 182 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EMAILBL_TEST_LEM 0.50 0 10 0.00% 5.49% 21 May Spam: 10 Total 192 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EMAILBL_TEST_LEM 0.50 0 11 0.00% 5.73% Those are not the total spam for the day but the cumulative spam from one day to the next. Though the percentile if figured on the total number of spam it's a total of 11 hits of 95 spam or 8.63% of spam for the time period I've been running it. I must have deleted your earlier post so I can't refer back to it. If this is not what your refering to I guess I'm not understanding you correctly. Chris -- KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
