Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
This is not about OpenProtect or their decisions. Actually, there are
more than this one sa-update mirror for the SARE rules.
I think you missed my point. The OpenProtect channel adds a bunch of
SARE rulesets in a single channel. This means that when you use that
channel, you delegate the decision on which SARE rulesets to include to
OpenProtect.
This is fine as long as their decisions fit your mail flow and policy (I
use OpenProtect's channel myself). If their decisions doesn't fit your
mail flow and policy, it's better to manually add the rulesets you want
(for example using Daryl's SARE channels).
OpenProtect just happens to be one of the mirrors to provide that
service to the >= 3.1.1 SA users out there. :)
They didn't write the rules, and they are not responsible for FP hits
*long* after the rules have been validated and updated last time.
They didn't write the rules, but they do decide wich rulesets to put in
their combined channel.
And of course they are not responsible for FPs. The person who
configured a system to use their channel is responsible for resulting
FPs (if any) in that system. Wich fits what I said to the OP as well.
Regards
/Jonas
--
Jonas Eckerman
Fruktträdet & Förbundet Sveriges Dövblinda
http://www.fsdb.org/
http://www.frukt.org/
http://whatever.frukt.org/
