I haven't looked at the rules at all (yet)...
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 20:00, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2009, Michael Monnerie wrote: > >> On Montag 04 Mai 2009 Justin Mason wrote: >>> >>> yep, it's certainly useful -- even if the "fix" is just to include >>> the FP messages in a mass-checked >>> corpus for the next time FRT_VALIUM1's score is calculated, ensuring >>> that it'll get a lower >>> score. >> >> It's in my mass corpus already, but I wonder if it's enough to have two >> messages where it's wrong to lower the score reasonably? Also, it's 3 >> rules misfiring. I didn't find from the rules why they believe in Viagra >> for that message, there is absolutely nothing about it, it's a real >> business e-mail with "lawyers german". So it's really a big PITA as it >> will probably hit many lawyers, and those are important customers after >> all ;-) > > Justin, is there some reason simply adding a trailing \b to those rules to > fix this isn't a good idea? > > -- > John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ > jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org > key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > USMC Rules of Gunfighting #9: Accuracy is relative: most combat > shooting standards will be more dependent on "pucker factor" than > the inherent accuracy of the gun. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > 4 days until the 64th anniversary of VE day > >
