yep, it's certainly useful -- even if the "fix" is just to include the FP messages in a mass-checked corpus for the next time FRT_VALIUM1's score is calculated, ensuring that it'll get a lower score.
--j. On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:19, Michael Monnerie <michael.monne...@is.it-management.at> wrote: > On Montag 04 Mai 2009 Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: >> > So what's next? There's a known big bug where several Valium rules >> > misfire at german messages. Should I open another bug? >> > I found bugs 6060 and 6086 reporting it, both are NEW. I've >> > commented both of them now, hope we get a quick optimization. >> >> Just downscore them locally in your local.cf or alike. > > And you think that's the correct way to do it? Spamassassin by default > misfires for German language mails, giving 4.1 points in error, so > everybody receiving german mails should reconfigure all of their > servers? > Would you give the same advice if there's a rule that gives 4.1 on > really every mail? "Just reconfigure locally" is OK when it's local > condition, e.g. when someone rescores to catch spam at something else > than 5.0 points. But you can't write wrong rules and require everybody > else to patch. I guess and hope you're not the maintainer of any rules. > There's a bug, it needs a fix. Not a local one, but a global. > > mfg zmi > -- > // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at > // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. > // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" > // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 > // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 > >
