On Sat, 2 May 2009 16:53:22 +0100 RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 May 2009 11:27:04 -0400 > Micah Anderson <mi...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > meta LOCAL_PHISHER_USERPASS ((( 0.2 * > > __LOCAL_PHISHER_USERNAME ) + ( 0.4 * __LOCAL_PHISHER_PASSWORD ) + > > ( 0.4 * LOCAL_PHISH_FROMREPLY)) > 1) BTW it should be a simple logical rule, you presumably don't want multiple hits on the usename and password rules triggering the rule without __LOCAL_PHISH_FROMREPLY.
