On Sat, 02 May 2009 11:27:04 -0400 Micah Anderson <mi...@riseup.net> wrote:
> > However there is a > rule that builds on that which doesn't fire, specifically the > LOCAL_PHISHER_USERPASS rule which does the math to add the > LOCAL_PHISH_FROM_REPLY to the __LOCAL_PHISHER_PASSWORD and > __LOCAL_PHISHER_USERNAME to get over a score of 1, but even though > those rules fire, the math addition doesn't seem to get over 1 and > thus the meta rule doesn't fire... > > what am I missing here? Simple numeracy. The test is evaluating (0.4 + 0.4 + 0.2) > 1 which is equivalent to 1 > 1 > meta LOCAL_PHISHER_USERPASS ((( 0.2 * > __LOCAL_PHISHER_USERNAME ) + ( 0.4 * __LOCAL_PHISHER_PASSWORD ) + > ( 0.4 * LOCAL_PHISH_FROMREPLY)) > 1)
