BWA HAHAHAHA Someone here isn't just using SA.
Got a bounce saying I said a bad word. For the record, it wasn't me. Microsoft Antigen for SMTP found a message matching a filter. The message is currently Purged. Message: "Re_ Spam Rats _ does anyone know them_" Filter name: "KEYWORD= profanity: bitch;sexual discrimination: bitch" Sent from: "Neil Schwartzman " Folder: "SMTP Messages\Inbound" Location: "psp/TRACYSV05" On 09/04/09 3:55 PM, "Neil Schwartzman" <neil.schwartz...@returnpath.net> wrote: > On 09/04/09 2:35 PM, "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: > >> That's the question. I do not object against listing of a spammer, but >> dynamic? naming convention? Will they block host if it spams, if it sends >> mail from gmail com and the hostname is qw-out-1920.google.com which looks >> like their upstream provider? >> >> >> OK, I don't want to bitch, I'm searching for some valid informations, mostly >> about their "best practices". > > Well there certainly has been some discussion on the MAAWG senders' list > about naming conventions and clarity or rDNS resolution HELO, and so on and > it is something *we* recommend to our certified and safelisted clients > (beyond FQ rDSN which is a requirement), but blocking on something that is > far far far from an industry standard? I'd suggest that is silly at best, > but "do tell us how that works out for you" as the phrase goes. -- Neil Schwartzman Director, Accreditation Security & Standards Certified | Safelist Return Path Inc. 0142002038
