On 08.04.09 10:45, Jesse Stroik wrote: > Dropping mail outright because you can't reverse-resolve the mail server > is bad, of course. And it /will/ drop messages from legitimate mail > servers, especially those on private networks behind mail proxies as > many older exchange installations are configured. And those > installations aren't configured wrongly, in the strictest sense.
Just FYI, the IP _does_ have _correct_ reverse DNS entry. I wouldn't complain if it would not. Yes, the entry is generic, however _not_ dynamic in any way. However you know the What I am complaining about is that the IP is reported to be dynamic because it does not have hostname that follows kind of sick rules. If I send mail from host fantomas.fantomas.sk, does it follow the rules? If I send mail from fantomas.test.nextra.sk, does it follow the rules? If I send mail from smtp.nextra.sk, does it? And if I'd send mail from a0.fantomas.cust.gts.sk, would it? Even if that record would be listed in SPF? I guess that marking address as "dynamic" just because the hostname does not start with "firewall", "mail" or WTF is braindead. > Unfortunately, determining which messages are spam is a hard problem. I know there are problems defining if messages are spam. However this way spamrats is creating another problemm. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "They say when you play that M$ CD backward you can hear satanic messages." "That's nothing. If you play it forward it will install Windows."
