On 1-Apr-2009, at 04:04, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On 31-Mar-2009, at 11:13, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
And even resetting the AWL ...
Why would you reset the AWL? I can't see any circumstance on which
that would be a good idea.
I had the impression that the latest category of spam going through
(online advertising jobs in bad italian) is going through because it
has BAYES_00, and that it has BAYES_00 because a good fraction of it
is receiving scores like -1.3, and that is receiving such scores
because it is incorrectly whitelisted.
Only if the spam is coming from KNOWN USERS using KNOWN SERVERS that
have sent you lots of HAM before.
Most if not all of such spam is "from localuser to localuser" where
tghe from is false.
This will not affect AWL if the messages come from outside.
whitelist_from @lambrate.inaf.it @iasf-milano.inaf.it
internal_networks 155.253.16/24
I suspect we should replace whitelist_from with whitelist_from_rcvd !
or something. whitelist_from is not a good idea.
--
I leave symbols to the symbol-minded - George Carlin
