On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 18:28 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Tue, March 31, 2009 17:39, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
> > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
>
> change to -12.0
> my suggestions do lower the autolearn so the setup need more manuel
> learning, [...]
Uhm, Benny, you do realize that there appears to be no manual ham
training according to the OP, do you?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
