> On 30-Mar-2009, at 11:52, Rik wrote: > >The MAIL RFC's were conceives a long time ago and have had some > >changes.
On 30.03.09 14:13, LuKreme wrote: > The changes (RFC2822) did not change enough. What is really needed is > SoSMTP (Son of SMTP) defined for port 26. You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If... http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html#programmer-11 > It would be 8bit compatible > and would NOT be backward compatible with current SMTP. It would not > have folding of headers lines and it would have exact standards on > every header (the precise format of every date, for example). Any > message that failed to be to the standards would be rejected for > transfer on port 26. Of course, it would require a valid SASL chain on > all servers from source to destination. http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html#senior-IETF-member-5 Wow! two hits in the same e-mail. Maybe some RFC's have flaws, however I'm afraid replacing SMTP wouldn't replace them all... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
