RobertH wrote:
I still think it's much better to report them to habeas for
spamming...
COI means confirmed opt-in. If you did subscribe, it is NOT
spam whether you want it or not. Isn't it good to have
someone who will sue spammers?
--
Matus UHLAR -
and the reason we use that here is that I know for a fact that I get
spam to a spamtrap address that (4 years ago) some idiot at a trade show
wrote down wrong and I get 'certified' spam now.
basically, if your email is SO BADLY FORMATTED, sent to SO MANY PEOPLE
THAT ITS IN RAZOR/DCC and spamcop, that you have to pay to have your
spam sent, ... well, its spam.
sorry habeas, I know you want to clean up your act, but years and years
and years of ignoring the problem doesn't get you a clean bill of health
overnight. If we have to google through the wiki to find the address to
complain, then its just easier to score it high to begin with and forget it.
if a private system doesn't want commercially 'blessed' spam, then can
use those rules.
if a spammer wants to pay habeas to send their spam, maybe they should
pay is to read it.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2009 Hot Company Award Finalist, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
_________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
_________________________________________________________________________
