On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:42 AM, LuKreme <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: > On 16-Mar-2009, at 16:40, Chris wrote: >> >> -8.0 HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI RBL: Habeas Accredited Confirmed Opt-In or >> Better >> [208.82.16.109 listed in > > > I changed my HABEAS scores ages ago: > > score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI -1.0 > score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI -0.5 > score HABEAS_CHECKED 0 > > I'm seriously considering changing them to 1.0, 0.01, and 0, respectively. > > I seem to ONLY see the headers in spam messages. It's a shame the defaults > in SA are still set absurd values. >
Funny, I mentioned to Chris off list that I've been using positive scores on all the Habeas accredited spam rules for quite some time with good results. Some of their junk is pure spam, more is the type of shady commerical junk that technically might not be "spam" but is still crap nobody wants, at least nobody here :) I completely agree that SA should not be giving such high negative scores to Habeas. There are a lot of folks who run the defaults, and they will get false negatives simply from these rules. > -- > Major Strasser has been shot. Round up the usual suspects. > >
