> > On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote: > > > > > Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already > > > (3.2.5 used here)? > > > > > My stats report those: > > > URIBL_JP_SURBL > > > URIBL_AB_SURBL > > > URIBL_SC_SURBL > > > URIBL_OB_SURBL > > > URIBL_WS_SURBL > > > > > No report of multi in there but lots of individuals...
> On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Jeff Chan wrote: > > No changes are needed. Any versions of SpamAssassin within the > > past 3 years use multi by default. Any SpamAssassin version 3 or > > later should be ok. > > > > There are a very few queries to the individual lists. I suppose > > it could be some very old installations of version 2.6. They > > should almost certainly upgrade to something more recent. On 08.02.09 11:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Sorry to ask a basic question but is this feature activated with: > > # URIDNSBL - look up URLs found in the message against several DNS > # blocklists. > # > loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL this urns on the whole functionality of using URI blacklists. The original problem is only about SURBL. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I bought a Macintosh".
