> > Ned Slider wrote: > > > Yes, additional DNSBLs such as psbl and uceprotect can be integrated > > > into SA
> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 15:19 +0100, Marcin Krol wrote: > > Well, isn't it better to use them before SA, provided your MTA does have > > this feature (I recommend Exim to everyone)? On 11.12.08 17:55, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > No -- unless you ultimately trust the RBL to produce a *negligible* > amount of FPs. Every single RBL does have FPs to a highly variable > degree. Instead ob outright blocking on a hit, it is a good idea to > assign a score for the hit only, and see what the result is after all > tests have been performed... However, using blacklists before SA saves much of bandwidth and CPU time. Our company's servers refuse daily ~3x more clients than mails that are daily processed. Configure combination of scoring and rejecting mail without the need of recceiving it as whole would be nice. Good that at least postfix supports pre-data filtering... > Exactly the SA approach. A single (or even a few) rules and RBLs can > misfire, without affecting the overall deliverability of a particular > mail. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. The 3 biggets disasters: Hiroshima 45, Tschernobyl 86, Windows 95
