> Ned Slider wrote: > >Also look at setting up Bayes and train it well. A well trained Bayes > >setup can hit 99% plus spam (for me) and can be highly effective.
On 11.12.08 15:19, Marcin Krol wrote: > Except I found that while it often gets positive identification right, > it sometimes produces false negatives (BAYES_00 negative scoring gets > fired on what it should classify as spam -- I reduced BAYES_00 scoring > for that reason). That's apparently problem of bad trained BAYES, not the problem of BAYES itself. Train more spams. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. We are but packets in the Internet of life (userfriendly.org)
