mouss wrote:
> Matt Kettler a écrit :
>
>> Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>>
>>> If I get a spam and I need to have SA learn that it's spam with
>>> sa-learn, wouldn't it be useful to also skew the AWL for that sender so
>>> that future uses of the AWL for that spammer will push the overall spam
>>> score up?
>>>
>>> Thots?
>>>
>>>
>> If a spammer is using the same sending address over and over again,
>> blacklist them entirely.
>>
>> That said, I've never seen a spammer re-use the same address twice.
>>
>
> My understanding is "the other side". you get a spam and awl gives it a
> negative score. you run sa-learn and you want this to "nuke" the awl
> entry because if awl gives a too negative score, then sa-learn is
> useless (unless BAYES_99 is set to a very high value).
>
>
That sounds like you have a broken trust path. It seems unlikely you'd
have gotten nonspam from the same address *AND* IP address before.
