Matt Kettler a écrit : > Brian J. Murrell wrote: >> If I get a spam and I need to have SA learn that it's spam with >> sa-learn, wouldn't it be useful to also skew the AWL for that sender so >> that future uses of the AWL for that spammer will push the overall spam >> score up? >> >> Thots? >> > > If a spammer is using the same sending address over and over again, > blacklist them entirely. > > That said, I've never seen a spammer re-use the same address twice.
My understanding is "the other side". you get a spam and awl gives it a negative score. you run sa-learn and you want this to "nuke" the awl entry because if awl gives a too negative score, then sa-learn is useless (unless BAYES_99 is set to a very high value).
