Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Please note that you do *not* need to specify all variations explicitly,
if you actually want to match *anything* that starts with "PO"...
Thanks for the information I will make sure to read it. I am going to
try /\bPO\b now and see if it helps.
Since this isn't your first attempt to write ham rules...
Rather than trying to catch FPs like this, I first would investigate why
any need for this in the place. *Why* are your hams looking that spammy?
Which rules do they trigger?
I have users reporting missing e-mails but when i ask for specifics for
the messages they never have them. I have not information to go by so I
want to try to prevent them the best I can until I can get speciic's
from them.
