On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:11 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > I created the test message and ran it through both ways. One with PO and > > the other with po. The rule fired on both. > > Err, this is bad, isn't it?
Doh! Ignore that line. A brain-fart made me read "with no".
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
