On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 16:55 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:31 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > > On 14.10.08 16:20, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > > Why not change its name to __SPF_PASS and only use it in meta-rules? > > > > because that's SA rule, even if I changed it, after first update it would be > > lost :)
> Is it forbidden for SA rules to have names starting with __ or merely > unconventional? so, disable it and create a new one" score SPF_PASS 0 header __SPF_PASS eval:check_for_spf_pass() describe __SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record tflags __SPF_PASS nice userconf then you can make meta-rules to your heart's content.
