Hello, so the spammers got it. my required_score is 3.5 (the same as for BAYES_99) and SPF_PASS is -0.001. So, even clear spam (I haven't seen FP for BAYES_99 for a LONG LONG time) is passed because of SPF (which teoretically should not happen.
Now I have a question: Should I zero score of SPF_PASS (I don't want SPA_PASS to score positively) or just a create meta rule of meta BAYESPAM_SPFOK (BAYES_99 && SPF_PASS) score BAYESPAM_SPFOK 0.001 Is it possible to score score BAYESPAM_SPFOK -$(SPF_PASS) ? which means, clear the effect of one rule if or can I do this? meta SPF_PASS (SPF_PASS && !BAYES_99) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Micro$oft random number generator: 0, 0, 0, 4.33e+67, 0, 0, 0...
